ref: 17a9a0291b51a6f1bf84e8ee5fdb2f46db8519bb
parent: 8a0907477f4813f69d584506224f956764c949b4
author: cinap_lenrek <cinap_lenrek@gmx.de>
date: Tue Jan 1 11:27:01 EST 2013
upas/marshal: change Inline: to Include: header, interpret even withou -8 flag after some thought, the file attachment headers Attach: and Include: (before Inline:) are more like the Subject: line and should be interpreted every time.
--- a/sys/man/1/marshal
+++ b/sys/man/1/marshal
@@ -155,12 +155,9 @@
.B -8
reads recipients (
.B To:
-and
.B Cc:
-) and attachments (
-.B Attach:
and
-.B Inline:
+.B Bcc:
) from RFC 822 header of the message
.PD
.PP
@@ -184,6 +181,17 @@
.EX
upasname=natasha@kremvax.com upas/mail boris@squirrel.com
.EE
+.PP
+.I Marshal
+interprets file attachment headers
+.B Attach:
+and
+.B Include:
+as if the
+.B -A
+or
+.B -a
+options would have been given.
.SH FILES
.TP
.B /mail/box/*/dead.letter
--- a/sys/src/cmd/upas/marshal/marshal.c
+++ b/sys/src/cmd/upas/marshal/marshal.c
@@ -47,7 +47,7 @@
Hx,
Hprecedence,
Hattach,
- Hinline,
+ Hinclude,
Nhdr,
};
@@ -72,8 +72,8 @@
[Hcontent] "content-",
[Hx] "x-",
[Hprecedence] "precedence",
-[Hattach] "attach",
-[Hinline] "inline",
+[Hattach] "attach:",
+[Hinclude] "include:",
};
struct Ctype {@@ -309,7 +309,7 @@
*/
holding = holdon();
headersrv = readheaders(&in, &flags, &hdrstring,
- eightflag? &to: nil, eightflag? &cc: nil, eightflag? &bcc: nil, eightflag? l: nil, 1);
+ eightflag? &to: nil, eightflag? &cc: nil, eightflag? &bcc: nil, l, 1);
if(rfc822syntaxerror){Bdrain(&in);
fatal("rfc822 syntax error, message not sent");@@ -501,10 +501,10 @@
s_append(s, "\n");
break;
case Hattach:
- case Hinline:
+ case Hinclude:
if(att == nil)
- goto Addhdr;
- *att = mkattach(hdrval(s_to_c(sline)), nil, hdrtype == Hinline);
+ break;
+ *att = mkattach(hdrval(s_to_c(sline)), nil, hdrtype == Hinclude);
if(*att != nil)
att = &(*att)->next;
break;
--
⑨