ref: 0411083184b47915745fd3d5f2d29217cf14b4c9
parent: 2d976ec561716a5ae1ac0739b32b30bc80fd21e9
author: sl <sl@deckard>
date: Wed Mar 15 21:27:52 EDT 2023
/lib/rsc: The plan9 port is becoming increasingly difficult to maintain and holds back non-plan9 development.
--- a/lib/rsc
+++ b/lib/rsc
@@ -249,3 +249,4 @@
So it sounds like everyone is in favor of the entire generics proposal and all the semantics, and all we have left to hammer out is the bracket characters? Do I have that right?
Or perhaps Go will earn a reputation for doing telemetry well and people will say things like "Go is the only software with telemetry you don't need to worry about." I think it's too early to say which would happen.
I am not suggesting that instrumentation be added by the Go compiler to all Go programs in the world: that's clearly inappropriate.
+The plan9 port is becoming increasingly difficult to maintain and holds back non-plan9 development.